Meghan Markle is returning to Britain with more independence than she had as a working royal, an arrangement experts say could test Buckingham Palace’s boundaries.
Markle, 45, and Prince Harry, 41, recently relocated to the United Kingdom with their children Prince Archie, 7, and Princess Lilibet, 5, for an extended stay though they will remain private, non-working members of the royal family.
While the couple is expected to establish a private residence outside London and keep their home in Montecito, California, royal observers told Fox News Digital that Markle’s ability to pursue her own media, business and public-facing projects from Britain could create new tension with the institution she once represented.
“The nightmare for the Palace is that they can’t be controlled,” royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams told Fox News Digital. “Diary clashes will probably mean royal engagements are overshadowed by what the Sussexes choose to do and what they are, or are not, asked to by the Palace.”
Kinsey Schofield, host of YouTube’s “Kinsey Schofield Unfiltered,” said that Buckingham Palace will have “very little control” over the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s public and commercial activities because they no longer represent Harry’s father King Charles as working royals.
PRINCE HARRY’S MOST CONTROVERSIAL ROYAL PLAN COULD STILL BECOME REALITY, AUTHOR SAYS
“They are private citizens and no longer working on behalf of the King, so Buckingham Palace isn’t approving Meghan’s interviews, appearances, Instagram posts or commercial projects,” Schofield said.
“But Harry is still the King’s son and Meghan is still the Duchess of Sussex, so there is an inevitable association with the monarchy,” she added. “That’s the complicated part. They can operate independently while still benefiting from an enormous amount of public interest that exists because of Harry’s DNA.”
MEGHAN MARKLE’S ROYAL EXIT HAD WARNING SIGNS YEARS EARLIER, VETERAN CORRESPONDENT REVEALS
Markle’s status as a private citizen living in the U.K. marks a sharp departure from her life as a working royal, when Palace protocols and communications staff shaped much of her public role. The former “Suits” star is returning with her own career, team and support system, according to People magazine.
“She has been vocal about how she felt about it before, but that doesn’t mean things are going to be exactly the same again,” an ally told People. “It doesn’t mean it can’t be different and can’t change.”
Another source told the outlet that the Sussexes’ support network is “stronger now than it ever was to protect her — to protect them.”
However, Schofield pointed out that Buckingham Palace retains one important source of influence.
“The palace can’t control what they do, but it can control access to the institution. It can decide how much proximity they have to working royals, royal residences, and official events,” she said. “That is where the palace still has considerable leverage.”
“Meghan may be returning without palace restrictions, but she is also returning without palace protection,” she added. “You don’t get one without losing the other.”
However, Buckingham Palace’s ability to limit the Sussexes’ access to official royal events, however, would not prevent their public appearances, announcements or business ventures from drawing attention away from the working royals. Fitzwilliams said that dynamic could become particularly challenging when it comes to the carefully coordinated royal calendar.
“The problem is that royal diaries are planned well in advance,” Fitzwilliams said. “Here there are likely to be numerous clashes, and this will fuel fascination with the Sussexes.”
Schofield told Fox News Digital that a competing announcement would not necessarily violate a formal Palace rule, but she noted there are longstanding expectations around the timing of public engagements.
“If Meghan were repeatedly scheduling appearances or announcements to coincide with major royal engagements, people would notice,” she said. “She might not be breaking a written rule, but there are conventions and courtesies around these things.”
“If you consistently attempt to overshadow the working Royal Family, eventually the pattern becomes the story,” Schofield added.
Schofield explained that the concern over competing headlines echoes the central issue Queen Elizabeth II confronted when Harry and Markle stepped back from their roles as working royals in 2020.
At the time, the late queen rejected a proposed hybrid arrangement that would have allowed the couple to pursue financial independence while continuing to carry out official duties and retain the benefits of their royal connection.
“This is essentially the dilemma the late Queen was trying to avoid with the original ‘half-in, half-out’ rejection,” Schofield said. “Meghan can enjoy enormous interest because she married into the Royal Family without having to behave or work like a royal.”
“But there is another side to that bargain,” she continued. “She doesn’t have the institution behind her anymore either. There is no royal communications operation required to defend her, no royal security, and no guaranteed place at major royal occasions. A lot of the perks are gone.”
The experts agreed that the question of access is further complicated by the fractured relationship between the Sussexes and the royal family. The couple publicly detailed strains within the royal family in their 2021 interview with Oprah Winfrey, their 2022 Netflix docuseries “Harry & Meghan” and Harry’s bombshell 2023 memoir “Spare.”
Schofield said that history could make Palace staff particularly wary as Harry and Markle establish a new life in the U.K.
“There is also a significant trust deficit,” she said. “Harry published private family conversations in ‘Spare,’ and Harry and Meghan have discussed private royal relationships publicly in interviews and their Netflix series. That history doesn’t disappear simply because they’re living in Britain again.”
British broadcaster Helena Chard told Fox News Digital that Charles and his son and heir Prince William may need to establish clearer expectations around the Sussexes’ access to official engagements and the working royal family as they settle back into Britain.
“Formalities need to be drawn up, put in place and made clear to all,” Chard said. “These will essentially be the ‘dos and don’ts’ formalities.”
According to People magazine, the Sussexes’ move back to the U.K. is also about more than their business interests or public profiles. The outlet reported that the decision was “taken as a family,” with the couple viewing a longer stay in Britain as an opportunity to connect their children with Harry’s heritage.
Earlier this summer, Archie and Lilibet joined their parents for a trip to the U.K. during which they reunited with Charles and Queen Camilla at Highgrove House, the king’s country home. The children also visited Althorp, the childhood home and final resting place of Harry’s late mother, Princess Diana. They were joined by Harry’s uncle and Diana’s brother Charles Spencer, and members of the late Princess of Wales’ family.
GET ENTERTAINMENT SCOOP DELIVERED RIGHT TO YOUR EMAIL BY CLICKING HERE
“Meghan feels very fortunate that they’re able to give Archie and Lilibet the opportunity to experience both worlds,” a source told People. Another insider shared that Harry wants his children “to understand the world he grew up in and where their family comes from.”
Meanwhile, not every royal observer expects Markle’s return to immediately deepen the rift.
Royal broadcaster Ian Pelham Turner told Fox News Digital that she may take a more restrained approach, similar to that of William’s wife and the Princess of Wales Kate Middleton, as the family establishes its new life in Britain.
LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS
“I feel Meghan will play a very cautious hand at first similar to that devised by Kate and be the very epitome of decorum, style and elegance,” Turner said.
PUT YOUR ENTERTAINMENT KNOWLEDGE TO THE TEST AND SEE HOW YOU SCORE
“The ability Meghan has is real empathy with people, a strong intelligent mind capable of using well rehearsed opinions to drive forward opportunities for many cultures and communities in Britain,” he added.
“I think she will relish the chance to prove her doubters wrong and be an asset in waiting for the Royal family again.”
